Morrow v HM Assistant Coroner for Merseyside [2025] EWHC 935 (Admin) 15 April 2025 judgment here
What the bereaved hope might be investigated at an inquest and what the inquest actually explores are often very different things. In this recent case the Assistant Coroner’s decision to draw a very tight investigatory scope was upheld by the Divisional Court. There is no new law here. Coroners have a wide discretion regarding scope and that discretion was properly exercised. The Coroner was entitled to have heard only limited evidence related to events very close to the time of death.
However there is still a lot to be learned from this case regarding how to avoid later conflict by bearing in mind the difficult position of an unrepresented bereaved family; seeking their views appropriately; managing their expectations by ensuring they fully understand the process; providing them full explanations of why an inquest’s scope might be narrowly drawn along with the reasons for relevant coronial decisions.