Supreme Court outlines Art 2 obligations in community & healthcare settings

R (Maguire) v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde [2023] UKSC 20 Anyone who had been holding their breath waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision in Maguire can now breathe out. Nothing has changed. The Senior Coroner, the Chief Coroner,[1] a High Court judge, and four Court of Appeal judges were all right.  Article […]

Read More… from Supreme Court outlines Art 2 obligations in community & healthcare settings

Refusal to answer a question seeking an opinion may be a contempt of court

R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 821 (Admin) A challenge to the Secretary of State for Justice amending the Parole Board rules and issuing guidance about those changes is not obvious bed-time reading for those who work in the coronial jurisdiction.   But hidden within the series of judgments arising from this […]

Read More… from Refusal to answer a question seeking an opinion may be a contempt of court

What does ‘by what means’ actually mean? Peering through the looking glass at the scope of an inquest.

Dove v Assistant Coroner for Teesside [2023] EWCA Civ 289 In Middleton[1] the House of Lords considered that a coroner determining ‘how’ a person died in a non-Art 2 inquest need only determine ‘by what means’ they died and not the broad circumstances .  But what does ‘by what means’ actually mean?  The answer seems […]

Read More… from What does ‘by what means’ actually mean? Peering through the looking glass at the scope of an inquest.